Showing posts with label reloading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reloading. Show all posts

Friday, July 1, 2011

Reloading for SHTF/TEOTWAWKI (long term storage)

Tips, logic, and observations about reloading and how to have your handloaded ammunition stand the test of time and reliability.

Photobucket

You are a slob reloader if:

  1. Cigarette hanging off the lips
  2. Beer in one hand
  3. Phone in one hand
  4. Dirty lead stained fingertips
  5. Food in one hand
  6. Think that the reloading max charge is “just a suggestion”
  7. Think any load is wimpy unless it is maxed out
  8. Think that primer seating flush or lower is “overkill”
  9. Think you can’t make a mistake because “you been doing this for __ years”
  10. Don’t understand the need for full length sizing (for first run or auto-loaders)

If you fit any of the above, stop reading now and go play out in the street... and if there is any justice in the world you will only kill yourself and not someone who does not deserve to land on the Darwin awards list.

Unlike some ill informed yuppie “survival” sources I am going to give you the researched and documented information you need to safely and reliably load quality ammunition for long term storage.
Safety is you primary concern and should stay priority at all times, an “anal rententive” reloader is a safe reloader.

Starting with primers.

Primer based slam-fires are not a myth this is a well documented FACT any source that attempts to propose that primers are not all that different and information can be “safely ignored” is giving dangerous advice. Free-floating firing pins in auto-loading firearms can and do cause an accidental “full-auto” condition from time to time. This without a doubt is as dangerous as an “out of battery” detonation. Often the entire magazine will fire without stopping and the panic handling of that out of control firearm is likely to cause an “out of battery” detonation. Again an “out of battery” detonation is known for destroying or severly damaging the firearm and harming nearby people as well as the shooter.

Yes there are real differences in magnum and standard primers (magnum primers have more material and burn longer) and there are thicker metal primer cups used in the “military” primers. Wolf brand primers marked “magnum” rifle primers are actually the thicker cup “military” primers charged as a standard primer. CCI produced “military” primers are the thick cup type and are charged as magnum primers. Use your reloading manual to find the specific use of magnum primers, not all cartridges identified as “magnum” will require a magnum primer. Here is a run down from the reloading manual:

Magnum primers are the appropriate choice for cartridges such as the popular .357 Magnum. Magnum primers work well with large volume cartridge cases, large volumes of powder, and slow burning powders this is also helpful with ball/spherical powders. Use of magnum primers is useful in non-magnum cartridges when extremely cold shooting conditions are encountered. Care should be used with magnum primers as the additional power represented in the primer itself can create overpressure in listed standard loads.

A magnum primer is useful in non-magnum cartridges for specific reasons such as cold weather conditions, but be advised that the loads for this combination must be worked up from the standard 10% drop in powder charge. When magnum primers are substituted for standard primers you can expect two grains of powder power value with rifle and .5 grain of power value with pistol loads - or greater, you must be careful and this is your responsibility to double check with your loading manuals.

Primer brands also have characteristics that make them more or less desirable for your particular uses. Federal primers are noted for consistency and favored by many accuracy minded shooters but are also slightly larger than standard with a sharp edge making them difficult to push into the primer pocket.

Always seat primers slightly deeper than flush/slightly recessed and slightly flattened (but not crushed) a slight compression of the charge pellet agianst the anvil fully into the primer pocket will be best. Often factory primers have a slightly extended anvil base as illustrated in the cross-section below, seating this into the pocket as the upper illustration will compress the primer charge slightly and should allow the primer to seat slightly below flush.

Photobucket

Consider adding a primer pocket cleaning brush and primer pocket uniforming cutter as they clean and uniform the inside well of the primer pocket this will aid in seating as well as remove any contaminants that could cause corrosion (you can forego the cleaning brush if you are using the chemical brass cleaning methods).

Photobucket

It is not uncommon to find primer pocket “crud” that will prevent the primer from seating fully into the pocket a primer pocket brush and a primer pocket cutter/uniformer is almost required when using the Federal large rifle primers.

Photobucket

Shiny, like new primer pocket ready for a new primer.

I do not paint on a sealant to the finished primer, conditions in the dry western states do not dictate that procedure, it may be useful in some rare wet conditions, but I have never had water contamination in any of my non sealed cartridges even in the wet swampy conditions of the gulf coast. It is possibly the most wasteful additional step suggested out in the "internet wild" that has little to no justification. If you don’t expect to have your ammo under fifteen feet of water for three months the primer sealant will only prove to be a problem when it heats and comes off the casing and fouls your bolt face.

One additional warning, some rifles like the HK SL6 and 7 and its brothers the 770 and 630 have extremely violent return and will slam the bolt face hard enough to deform some cases and cause them to fire because the brass in the primer pocket will constrict and ignite the primer pellet charge. Choose and test your brass and primers for reloading carefully.

The cartridge case.

Commonly you will find spent aluminum, brass, and steel cases at the range, contrary to common (and often willfully ignorant) internet drivel steel cases are reloadable and safe to use for handloading (with a possible shorter life) the steel cases are prone to rust formation and therefore best used for “make and shoot” use.

I am not going to go into the pain involved with berdan primed cases or the fact that aluminum cases are dangerous as we have more important issues to review, simply berdan is relaodable but takes aditional steps and time and the primers are not commonly available, aluminum cases are best recycled to avoid problems (try youtube and google for more about berdan primer reloading).

For our basic needs for long term storage brass cases are the most reasonable choice, it is available, easy to work with, and resistant somewhat to corrosion. Brass has its own special types of corrosion, take a look at the below photos, note how brass (and copper) corrosion can look surprisingly like mould on bread.

Photobucket

Photobucket

If you store your ammunition with the above corrosion evident, the storage time of that ammunition will be much, much shorter, the corrosion only gets worse.

The above two photographs show the worst type of corrosion on your brass cases, this corrosion is destructive, the brown/grey uniform corrosion (also known as a brown patina) is benign and can actually protect the bras from additional corrosion. The creeping black, fuzzy light green/grey, and red colored corrosion as you see above is quite destructive and sadly “grows” so once started, severe methods are needed to remove and stop the corrosion process. Destructive corrosion must be removed. Note the use of gloves to prevent contamination from oily fingerprints.

The first order of business is to prepare the brass cases for reloading, I prefer to clean the brass to like-new shiny condition and handle with gloves. My current method is to use a vibrating abrasive but the newer stainless steel media with a wet acid process or the sonic chemical cleaning either may prove to be my next method of cleaning brass cases. Both methods give a brighter and cleaner finish to the brass than the vibratory cleaner with walnut hulls chips. The wet chemical methods do clean the inside walls of the case and the primer pocket, cleaned to a mirror finish no less, saving the step of cleaning primer pockets individually and no annoying packed walnut hulls or bits stuck in the primer hole.

For longevity in storage, cleaning the brass may be the most important step. All of my range scrounged brass is first washed in hot top water and dish soap, I have a screw-on lid container and shake vigorously then place in a colander drain and then repeat without soap until the dirt and contaminates are gone. Set out in the sun and dry and then its time to size and de-cap the brass and then clean to shiny-new.

Case preperation often requires trimming the brass to the correct length, I first size all of the brass in batches and then sort them using the callipers to sort too long from the in-spec brass and trim the too long cases. The correct length of the typical rifle case for example, can dictate if the round will load into the rifle’s chamber or end-up jammed protruding out of battery.

Photobucket

A typical case trimming lathe, notice that a portable hand drill is connected to speed up the trimming of cases.

Component storage.

Cool, dry, dark - the standard for all long term storage, I will add to this, be sure and isolate the active components (primer and powder) from any solvents and fumes, finished ammunition can benefit from this simple rule also, but the active components are very susceptible to damage by fumes, solvents, and oils.

The bullet

A recent question I started to calculate was the type of projectile I wanted in storage, I have a considerable amount of military surplus non-corrosive ammunition with full-metal-jacketed bullets probably the most pathetic choice for self defense. Lets be honest how many “bad guys” will be out there and wearing projectile resistant body armor? Instead of drilling a very small consistent hole in a deer you need to eat to survive - and then watching it bound into the distance never to be seen again -would you not prefer to have a premium preforming bullet drop it within 100 yards?

I was given the task of removing some dangerous wild dogs years ago and I stupidly loaded my self-loading .308 with surplus FMJ rounds and every canine I shot center chest and every one ran-off - in one case we found one over a full mile away from where he was shot! I for one would want to drop a dangerous wild dog on the spot. FMJ bullets are just not capable of the shock and consistent terminal performance of a premium bullet. What can we expect - "pointed ogival spitzer tip shape have a tendency to fragment on impact with soft tissue, harder organs, bone or the clothing and/or equipment worn by the individual soldier” but this effect aided by the sections and cannelure (yes the bullets sometimes fold in half and break at the cannelure).

I have seen it proposed that softer tips can cause malfunctions in some rifles and that the deformation of the tip will make a “flyer,” what is interesting is that you can find on-line an several test studies of bullet performance with deformed tips from several rifles including magazine feed, and will find that the accuracy difference is actually less than the diameter of the bullets at 100, 200 and 300 yards. Bullet deformation that will impact the accuracy the most is damage to the base of the bullet look over a few varmint and benchrest groups for more information (or "The Bullets Flight" by Franklin Mann). Simply put the greatest two bullet related issues for accuracy are the base and the exit of the bullet from the barrel. Giving up premium bullets for FMJ for the deformation issue is just following ignorant wives tails - if you have a rifle that will not feed reliably with premium bullets - trade that pig out on a rifle that actually works! Anyone proposing that slight tip (meplat) deformation is equal to massive loss in accuracy has just not done any serious research (a massive problem with many delusional and ignorant yuppie survivalists).

Premium bullets are available in bulk for prices not that much higher than bulk FMJ when you look at the possible usefulness of the round loaded with a premium bullet (at the time of writing this Graf and Sons has .308 150 gr. FMJ for $20.59 per 100 and Lead Tip 150 gr. for $20.99 $18.99 on sale!). In the last year I have only purchased premium bullets of various types like Silver tips, Lead tips, hollow points, and have produced by swaging sectioned, frangible, and hollow point bullets. The FMJ bullets are just regulated to field and range practice, for very special needs there are loose bulk armor penetrating small arms bullets available at many gun shows and on-line, they are legal to possess and can be loaded when the need arrises.

Photobucket

Premium 9mm (.355) 121 gr. lead tip hollow point bullets ready to load.

Loading the final cartridge.

Photobucket

I always seat to standard lengths that fit all the loading devices (clips, magazines, and tubes) for that round and crimp using Lee’s factory crimp dies. This is a choice based on the possible need to use “anything” in the collection in “any” rifle and from my testing and the testing of others the Lee factory crimp dies actually improve accuracy for standard use loads. I do have quite a bit of storage ammunition that is made specifically for a longer range scoped heavy barrel .308, but all of the ammo will work in all of the .308 rifles in a pinch.

There is from time to time the suggestion that “tar sealed” bullets are premium for storage, not only is the procedure difficult and time consuming but the results are best described as “dirty as a five dollar crack whore.” I see no reason to seal the bullets myself, I use a crimp die that I think accomplishes this well, but if I were to take the time - the method of applying a thin layer of melted paraffin wax to the inside with a q-tip before pouring the powder and seating the bullet I think has some merit. Glue, tar, paint, and other sealing compounds are all future contaminates.

Long term storage

Back in the 1980s a strange little book came to my attention, I remember that he suggested placing your ammo into military ammunition boxes and then covering the boxes with fiberglass and resin (a hot procedure due to chemical heating) for storage underground. Can you imagine the effort it would take to open that box? Hey guys wait with the raping and looting I need to get my ammo out! I have to chuckle about the strange ideas we see every day.

I prefer to also box all the ammunition into containers like the Midway or Top Brass cardboard boxes (similar to factory boxes) or into the plastic storage boxes like the Berry’s or case-guard. All of the ammunition is stored in three ways, in air sealed tool lockers, in vacuum packed “grab bags” and sealed PVC pipe for burial catches.

Now we do want the optimum conditions, again they are cool, dry, dark and one addition, clean. I do prefer the typical blank cardboard box as it is non-reactive and is not tightly air sealed, I have some corrosion on some green soft plastic “battle packs” of Portuguese ammunition that clearly they sealed with some moisture inside the “battle packs” obviously moisture is a major factor in brass corrosion and this has allowed some corrosion to damage the brass in the packs obviously a desiccant packet would have helped.

I have several PVC storage containers, what bothers me most about this particular method is not that it does not work - in fact it works very well - it is the fact that it is difficult to open and takes time even with the correct tools. I keep thinking of a quote but I do not remember the source “by the time you put your guns into the ground it was long past the time to start using them!'

Saturday, May 28, 2011

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Swaging jacketed bullets a new skill for TEOTWAWKI

I make by swaging jacketed rifle bullets of several types and caliber and even more pistol styles and calibers using Corbin equipment (had other more expensive equipment available in the 70s to the 90s but have chosen Corbin for the superior quality and higher quality product produced). And just to be honest, I did use swaging for rifle as a business (class 6) and sold custom special product nation wide in the past but sold the business - I guess that makes me a former "professional".

I am a reloader from 1978 or so and swager from 1982. I guess cost to me was always relative, while in the business of making bullets for demanding customers the best tools were necessary... While I did sell most of my equipment I did cherry pick a good selectionof manual tools and a few caliber choices to continue as a hobby.

I can tell you without any reservations that it is much better as a hobby rather than a profession. I also note that reloading in general and casting (I still do some casting, but prefer jacketed bullets) and particularly swaging are rare, not particularly for saving money (yet that seems to be an issue again now) and appeals to a narrow personality type (my wife would call it a disorder). I am about the youngest swaging loader I know of (not 50 for some time yet).

As luck would have it swaging is not that hard to get into if you plan to swage small caliber or pistol bullets (lead or jacketed) as there are “reloading press” swage dies. Although I use a large array of expensive dies I have lots of respect for the CH/4D effort to keep home swaging dies within reason (cost) along with the limited selection of reloading press dies available from Corbin or RCE/Walnut Hill.

Honestly I loved reloading so much that I accidentally got into swaging when I was taking a hunter education course. The older gentleman who was teaching the class was an old buddy of my grandfathers and he had an old swage set from Ted Smith that would do jacketed and 3/4 .357...

I was hooked and then saved up to get my first M style press (I still have it) and started with .224 and then .308 then 9mm, .357 and on.

Swaging like reloading is for the most part not for saving money but rather doing something others cannot produce. A nice thing about making .224 bullets (what the .223/5.56 uses) with old .22 shells is the thin jacket great for varmint shooting, the .22 LR makes a particullarly thin jacket and the FPS that thin jacket can take is almost maxed out with the .223/5.56. For shooting pests and non fur gathering coyote shooting you can't beat a frangable .223 with a thin jacket .22 lr conversion, the bullets are often ugly and great care must be taken not to fold the jacket over (heat-treating helps) - so to make the point again, money savings is killed by the higher labor/time nessassary.

Looking over the Corbin website I was checkig the .22 lr conversion dies (work with a reloading press) to iron out the rim on a .22lr is $130 then you could add the reloading die type set to seat the core and form the point that set is $348.00. That is a 2-die set for .224 cal and makes an 6-S ogive. 6s is a standard ogive, a middle of the road point curve with 3-5 good for heavy hunting bullets with a more rounded nose and 8 plus reserved for target/long range shooting. When I got my first set of conversion dies I jumped full in and got dies and the special press along with the reloading press dies for ironing out the .22 lr rims... the entire set cost less than the above together...

Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket

My first MM style press was the "gold" series press (the shortest run ever made) cast from an industrial non spark bronze (and gave it the gold color - now with a nice patina green/brown/gold). If you wanted to cut lead wire or cast cores to weight and seat the core or use "sand shot" to make frangable cores the reloading dies work well as long as you have a good strong press like the Lee Classic Cast Press, RCBS Rock Chucker Supreme (both minumum), or the CH4D Heavy Duty Champion Press. I would not recomend any speciality press or turret press for this operation.

Photobucket

Just to be fair CH4D also makes dies for swaging, but most are made for jacketed pistol bullets, the dies are based on some of the older Herters reloading die thread type of dies. That CH4D press is also a great monster reloading press! For swaging I prefer the Corbin or Walnut hill type press (can double as a super heavy reloading press). The CH/4D dies also require a mallet or a drag-down frame that pushes out the bullet when you return the handle on the press.

Photobucket
The Corbin press with the CH/4D dies and the ejector frame device attached (the threaded posts)

When I ran the business I had a knack for creative bullet design and sold to a specific group of markets - Benchrest, Varmint shooters, and Special demands... All three markets, at least for me represented a demand for frangible bullets (come apart on impact, one of the most popular was a low penetration frangible that had a lower chance of deep penetration in walls and was very good at breaking glass windows without having large heavy parts continue to go past the glass - that was a very special use bullet. Now I make jacketed bullets for my own use, I make just regular lead core target bullets, bonded lead core bullets for hunting, and frangible bullets for shooting coyote (pest removal, as frangible tends to ruin the pelt and I like to use .308 for coyote frangible in .308 would not leave enough pelt to make it worth the work).

I have even produced powder tungsten core bullets for special applications by custom order, but the material is too expensive for general use. I never bothered to make or even atempt much with solid gliding metal or copper bullets because the need for higher level hydraulic equipment was never worth the investment in light of the market availability of higher production run products (like Barnes).

If a a budget is the issue.... I was looking at the RCE site for reloading dies, it seems Richard wanted to make available swage equipment for reloading in a mass-market way to keep the prices down and have items in stock... Both Corbin brothers are notoriously behind in production and rarely have much in stock a crop of new producers are springing up and this is GREAT news. BTSniper Custom Tools and Dies is one such producer.

Prices are lower, and the .22lr dies for the conversion are listed at (Rimfire jacket maker .224 caliber RFJ224-1) $60.00 not a bad price... The two die set for making jacketed bullets (pre cut and weighed core -no core swage (that takes the larger special presses) is listed at (22 .224” Flat base, 6S TOS224-1) $175.00.

So the total with a bottle of lube (this is important - lube and the properuse is one of the keys nessassary) would be about $240.00 for .224 jacketed bullets (not counting lead wire or cast cores) using a good pre existing reloading press ...

Not bad, as far as cost. $240. (Note: prices are now out of date and products may be unavailable)

I though a few would like a simple overview of the swage process with some drawings I made...

The drawings are deliberately exaggerated to explain the process...

The process is based on making cold flow lead swaged jacketed bullets, other materials take a different procedure. The Drawings are also based on the special equipment I have that is designed only for swaging, the reloading press dies work in a similar way but not in the exact same way and also have fewer steps... Swaging is a process of expanding up not squeezing down in diameter, a smaller thinner (but taller) product is expanded under pressure to fill a larger diameter...

Step one.

Photobucket

You need a lead core to place in the jacket...

If you are using the reloading type dyes the core is made of pre cast lead or cut lead wire and filed or whittled to the correct weight. If you are using die sets that contain a core swage then this the first step is to cut a lead wire just slightly heavier than needed. Take the cut wire and place it into the core swage, pull down on the press handle and apply pressure to the lead until it fills the die and starts to squeeze out of the bleed hole, once adjusted the core swage will make all of the cores the exact same weight and size. Proper pressure resistant lubrication (I use a lanolin/castor oil based lubrication) is applied to the lead before forming or the core will get stuck. The lubrication must be removed with a solvent like alcohol before the next step.

Second step.

Photobucket

The second step (or first step for reloading press dies) is to place the clean, weighted core into the jacket ready for the core seat die.

Third step.

Photobucket

This step is where the core is expanded into the jacket, note that the core when compressed will flow around the punch (and in this case the hollow point is pressed into the lead) until the expansion is stopped by the jacket as it is pressed against the inside of the die.

Note that this punch is made slightly smaller than the inside of the die to fit INTO the jacket to produce a true hollow point with an ogive (curved part of the front) that is covered by the jacket.

Photobucket

Note that as the punch comes to it's final position the jacket has expanded to the inside of the die with a hard pressed lead core on the inside. As before proper lubrication is necessary or the lead seated into the jacket will lock the jacket into the die, lubrication only on the outside of the jacket.

Once fully seated the jacket and core is ejected from the die.

Fourth step.

Photobucket

The last step in making this jacketed bullet is to form the point or ogive.

Using the ogive or point forming die, the seated core is placed into the die and will form a point and slightly expand as pressure is applied.

The hollow point is forming under the jacket as the ogive is folded over the open lead.

Once formed the final finished bullet is ejected by a punch.

It takes longer to read that than to do each step...

About the time and force of forming .357 cases and seating a bullet...

For reloading die type swage dies... CH4D

Look under "bullets" from the left hand list...

Go to 101 bullet swage dies...

This is a two step swage die (no core swage) for a jacketed HP...

101410HP 10mm/40 S&W Hollow Point Swaging Die Set - $ 185

Or the soft poont...

101410SP 10mm/40 S&W Soft Point Swaging Die Set - $ 185

The folks at CH4D are great, I have used their "speciality die" custom services before and were great to work with, they make a great product...

The dies they use are the older style Ted Smith type for reloading presses and they can be broken if not uses correctly (in fact all dies can be cracked when using the wrong lead it must be the lead hardness it was designed for harder lead larger holes).

A part of RCE, makes dies for reloading presses...

They also make the special dies for the swage presses (like I use).

I will post more on the CH4D dies and my .355 hollow point set I have.

Monday, April 4, 2011

Reloading imported (boxer primed) steel .223 cases

I have seen posted both pro and con of reloading steel cases, but not enough info to make a good judgment, so I started picking up the Wolf .223 fired cases. I have also (far in the past) reloaded Berdan primed cases, I fount the experience "less than satisfying" for the time expended, Berdan primed cases CAN be reloaded but it requires more time. Steel cases are harder than brass and some rifles could have parts damaged by the harder steel cases (a possibility, but this author has not had that experience). I prefer to find my own answers based on experience or facts based on documentation. Far too much has been posted containing too much conjecture about how the steel is too hard for the dies but NO FACTUAL DOCUMENTATION. What we do know is hard on dies is abrasives on the cases or abrasive contamination in the dies (dirt) the dies are considerably harder steel than the Wolf casings. So I decided to experiment myself, I was willing to risk the sizing die just to document what happens for my own answers and to test the results. I know that most dies are hardened far above and beyond what any steel case and it’s material could damage, aluminum cases would be adding abrasives to the mix, but steel with lubrication should be well within the working range of the dies. Of course I was making a guess that the steel cases are not as hard as one would think (or as much as has been posted on the internet), I see no damage so far with the current dies I am using, I have been keeping an eye on measurements of the dies to see as I progress in this experiment. (Update, no change whatsoever) So far I have picked up Wolf .223 that is boxer primed every time I go to the range - I live in a desert area, so rust is not that big of a problem, some are pitted more than others and the worst examples are culled. I tumbled them using simple play sand to nock off the paint/polymer and to clean out any rust inside or outside, and remove any of the worst of the rust. I then vibrate them in walnut abrasive with paper towel strips and old fabric softener sheets and three teaspoons of mineral spirits, just to make sure the sand does not get in the dies. (Update, I have changed to a water wash and quick dry prior to sizing, the rust has not become a problem, but it will develop.) I then size with a mix of lanolin and castor oil (swage lube-anti rust), trim, and vibrate them again as above... They come out nice and silver shiny, I shoot them quickly so I don't bother waxing or painting the cases, a thin wipe with lube wax or even swage lube would prevent rust, but I don't bother. (Update, I have switched to vegetable cooking oil for sizing as it is easier to remove.) I was going to anneal the cases, but I decided not to, so that I could simulate less than optimum conditions (normal) along with a warning I recieved. I was warned that annealing Steel would be different than brass. It involves heating the steel to a known temperature and then keeping it at that temp for a set time. You then have to cool the steel in a controlled matter. If a user attempted to anneal steel like brass the result will be hardening of the steel and Increased brittleness. Here is what has happened so far... I am shooting them out of four rifles, a T C encore, a bolt action, an HK 630, and an AR 180 franken clone (more on that later). (Update, currently the two KelTec SU16 rifles are digesting the steel hand-loaded ammunition.) The HK rifles, with three shots in you can tell the fouling gases were passing the flutes. HK and steel, possibly not the best combination but that is not a big secret. The HK had a few slam fire problems with the .223 but that is also true of military 5.56 cases of brass. (Update, a switch in primers eliminated this problem and now unlike the Military brass cases, the steel cases work fine without any problems.) TC Encore - I honestly could not tell the difference from the Wolf and the military brass I often use, with the same loads it all shot in a similar way, I even did a blind mix and the groups did not show any significant change, there is more fouling around the case mouth. Sooty and black it indicates that the case is shrinking at the mouth when pressures drop, the bypass does not show "jets" of gas bypass. Bolt rifle, similar to the Encore, but tends to group to the left about .25 inch at 100 yards compared to the brass cases (the drift could easily have be environmental not the ammunition), no particular change in group size. (Update, change was environmental as this drift cannot be repeated, in other words it has not happened again.) AR 180 clone (the V18) fouling to the case neck, no jets, black and sooty, but it does this with brass cases, I note a light increase with the steel cases While all of the rifles showed similar issues, the AR180 clone is the hardest on cases (any case brass or steel), because I knew it was abusing the cases, I keep the best records on what was happening. First cycle of reloading, any cases that had pitting from rust at the case mouth split from edge to edge on the mouth at the pitted areas (of the pitted cases) one in five split- one reloading. Second reloading, more splits on pitted cases at about one out of three, the fresh cases that did not have any rust did not show signs of distress. Third reloading, more splits on pitted cases now at about half of the pitted cases, one pitted case ruptured at the mid point. Fresh cases start to show splits at the mouth one out of about dozen. Fourth reloading, most of any pitted cases are now gone, and the fresh cases start to split at the mouth at about one in each ten. I have not loaded further at this point... I found the rejects at just above what I get from military brass cases, for free "pick ups" the fresh fired cases are not bad for an abusive autoloader, the reloads are much more accurate than the original loadings of wolf and I can shoot Varget (my favored powder) with bullets of my choice. I have not broken any parts on the autoloader (extractor or ejector) but the work hardening of the cases is evident with the mouth splits. I think that while I am using a small sample it clearly points out that the steel cases DO NOT last as long and have peculiar properties when compared to brass cases and reloading. I certainly would not argue that for the purposes of reloading, clearly the brass casings are superior, even if it were a matter or a few statistical percentage points that would prove the issue, in this case it is clearly far more than just a few percentage points of improvement. While a good quality rifle can shoot inexpensive ammunition at least to mediocre levels a bad rifle will shoot even premium ammunition at lower than mediocre levels. Accuracy does not seem to be significantly influenced by the use of a steel case. While not as well documented as I would like, the experiment showed that while not as easy to work or as long lasting, the possible accuracy is similar if not on par with brass casings for general use loading. With all other items the same, quality bullets, primers, and powders and the same loads, steel cases showed no change in accuracy. This makes a point that the case, when construction sizes are within a specific tolerance range, is not the arbiter of accuracy as much as the charge of powder, bullet quality and suitability of the bullet size and powder charge to the particular rifle. I will continue to progress with this experiment if only to answer the question in a way that is satisfying. In some ways I feel some satisfaction in even reusing the cases even one time rather than regulation to the garbage or scrap dealer, in the same way I fee satisfaction in local recycling programs. Why are steel cases on the ground at the range and brass is not? Clearly two valid reasons, value of the scrap and ease of use while reloading. Berdan priming is an issue because most steel cases are produced with berdan priming, and boxer priming is much easier to size and remove the primer in one simple operation. There is the possibility of corrosive components used in steel cased surplus ammunition. Disinterest in the cases due to simply to reputation. I chose to reload the .223 Wolf because it was plentiful, made with non-corrosive components, and produced with a standard style Boxer primer. I guess that makes me more "green" as a hand-loader. The reloading of boxer primed steel cases took far less time and effort to reload than brass berdan cases would take. In that regard I was also noting that the reloading of the steel cases was showing no more "wear and tear" on the dies or the rifle used to fire them. Certainly there is no current shortage of brass casings, and outside of price they are a better choice. So outside of a desire to stop "seeing something go to trash" and the willingness to risk as set of inexpensive dies for an experiment, there was no reason outside of simply testing theory with application. I note no "wear and tear" on the dies nor any undue added difficulty in effort to form cases, prime, or trim in comparison to military brass. I consider this a successful experiment, and specific questions were directly answered with actual testing. If I feel to lazy to pick up a batch of reloaded steel cases for additional loadings, I can fee justified in allowing them to rust in positions knowing I used them once and that the reloaded versions fired with more accuracy and were of more consistent nature than the original Russian factory loading. I started reloading from the start because it was conservative in nature, and handloading will provide better control than factory offerings. The reloading hobby/habit is then justified yet again. Reloading is certainly not primarily to save money, because when counting labor, it never was less expensive. Most likely never will be, outside of obscure and rare calibers or loadings. I wanted to check, the negative comments on loading steel cases were all "I won't even try it" I was willing to risk my dies, I'm just not willing to tell someone "you can't do it" or "that would be bad" when there were no reliable sources for a factual response. It is clear from my current experiment now close to 4000 rounds of steel cased .223 wolf full length sized and ABSOLUTELY NO CHANGE IN THE THE DIES OR ANY WEAR that I can detect with my micrometer or calipers... I do use a very good lube I make myself with castor oil and lanolin (a swage lube) to make sure none of the cases get stuck, and I make sure the cases are VERY clean and no rough pitting before I size (but I do that with brass cases)... This testing holds that steel cases have little to no effect on the dies or their performance in comparison to brass cases. I'm not saying that they could or could not be harder on an extractor, or ejector on a rifle as that is outside of the testing I was conducting. Testing with real world supplies and actual use of product, I am not making a guess, I am actually using the product and keeping an eye on the results, I may not even use all of the cases, but I wanted to see and was willing to risk the dies. The testing showed, at least with Lee dies steel cases can be processed and there is no additional wear... With clean cases, well lubricated, and use of reasonable quality dies it not only works but is of little difference or consequence ON THE DIES and the physical effort required is only slightly elevated from the brass cases, far less effort than .308 brass full length sizing. I think the fear of this was only speculation based on comparison to the steel cases performance with extractors on auto-loading rifles.I will gladly note any damage if only for a warning to my fellow handloaders, but as it stands now I do not note any additional die wear or damage, while the steel cases are NOT better than brass for our use as hand-loaders they are clearly also NOT quite as bad as I have seen them made out to be either.

Viability of reloading primers?







Now remember the toy gun roll caps?

Forster still makes the Tap-O-Cap to make black powder caps from aluminum cans - you fill the cap with the toy roll caps!

They would be cheeper and more effective than the strike-all matches, used in this way. About 5 bucks for 1000 cap rolls. It makes the priming corrosive as I think the strike all matches are also.

A simple die and punch for reforming primers would be easy to make.

This information and idea is only for review and educational reasons, users are warned that anything is at your own risk, including standard reloading.


This is a potentially dangerous idea and if a user were to find a way to make fulminate of mercury, lead azide or lead styphnate - the compounds are very toxic (illegal to make without .gov approval papers) and very dangerous.

Some chemicals react to copper and brass or humidity and can self ignite or make compounds that will self ignite.

Best to stay on the safe side and keep your fingers.

Now some information about standard primers.

Paper patched (jacketed) bullets



In use with a very low powder load, a reason for the terrible accuracy, a proper load for cast bullets should have been used, even low loads for jacketed bullets can be used (research loads carefully on this issue). Of course black powder can be used.



Paper patched bullets in detail. You should download and save this, I swage, but this is useful information if needed. Paper jacketed bullets can approach metal jacketed bullets in accuracy and velocity. Many wrap them dry I prefer to use a NON POLYMER glue with my paper patched bullets. Don't use Elmer's glue (a polymer glue) it leaves crap in the barrel. Try a paste such as a Nori Rice Paste or make your own:

Papier-Mache Paste

Materials

1 cup water
1/4 to 1/3 cup flour (white, or rice flour - rice flour is best)
5 cups lightly boiling water
Large saucepan

Directions

Mix flour into 1 cup water until mixture is thin and runny.
Stir this mixture into lightly boiling water.
Gently boil and stir 2-3 minutes.
Cool before using.

This type of glue takes over 6 hours to dry.< The paper itself is important, see the review along with the directions. Paper patching.

Hunting an shooting the paper patched bullet.

Tricks with paper patched bullets.

A beginners look at paper patched bullets.

Consider this: when the Sharps Rifle Company was at its heyday in the 1870's and 1880's, the PPB was the most common bullet offered in their factory ammunition. Why? Because the PPB was and is the best lead game killing bullet available. The demise of the American Bison can be attributed primarily to PPBs. PPBs were easy to make by the frontiersman, requiring nothing but a skillet, pig lead, patching paper and a mould. Untold thousands of PPBs were made by the campfires during the 1880's.

- Dave Jennings

Handloading "Working up a load” (and more on supplies)


"Working up a load" where the hand-loader loads 25 to 50 rounds of a bullet and powder to see what shoots best, you will find that pistol loads will start to work out sooner than rifle.

My favorite rifle powder is called Varget, and I choose it over other powders because of the cold temperature stability and firing under the same cold conditions. It is a powder made into little rods or sticks and it does not "cast" as well as powders that are little flakes or balls... the powder WW 748 is a ball shaped particle powder and is easy to cast from a powder measure into accurate weights... The other ball powders that may work well would be BLC 2 (flattened donut shaped balls), Accurate 2230 (flattened donut shaped balls), Accurate Arms MR-2460 (flattened balls), H335 (flattened balls), DuPont IMR-4895 (rods), Accurate Arms MR-2520 (balls), Hodgdon H380 (balls), there are other brands like Vihtavuori, and Scott, you may not find everywhere...

I order my powders, primers, and bullets I do not make from...

http://www.powdervalleyinc.com
http://www.wideners.com
http://www.grafs.com

When you order powder and primers, make sure you order enough to make it worth the HAZ MAT fee that comes with the primers and powder...

I just ordered another 10k of primers and an 8lbs keg of powder, the order not confirmed yet... they are all behind now because of the panic...

You can figure out the basic cost per round by using the grain vs. pounds of powder, brass, bullets, and primers...

For example .308 in Varget powder will load 1360 rounds with an 8 lbs keg in one of the standard loads for 147 gr bullets... .270 will use MORE powder than .308.

I would suggest that when you make the next trip to a local reloading supplier get a pound of three different rifle and three different pistol powders. (check the loading manual) and try them out, once you find a good powder you like buy a keg...

Most hand-loaders load for accuracy, but there are other reasons, in my case it is cold/hot weather stability, reasonable accuracy, and reliability...

Sunday, April 3, 2011

Primers, safety, reloading manuals, and shell holders

Primers.

What a many handloaders do not know is that primers have fine powdered glass mixed into the explosive primer mixture.

when cooked off the powdered glass super heats and travels into the casing providing a more consistent ignition.

Magnum primers are not only hotter but contain particles deliberately designed to help propel an ignition producing body of super heated particles deep into the powder charge, this could be bad for the eyes...

I also suggest, because of lead content, to not eat, not smoke, not drink (anything, adult beverages particularly) and think about gloves as posted by others, I use latex gloves for hand-loading and swaging. Both latex and nitrile gloves are available from Harbor Freight.

When you buy a set of dies, you usually do NOT get the required shell holder with them. The exception to this is if you buy dies made by Lee. Their dies actually come with the shell holder, which you will need, and also a powder scoop, which you may or may not wind up using.

If you are thinking of getting the Lee Factory Crimp die (and I do recommend it), you can often find Lee "Deluxe" die sets, which are the 3 standard dies plus a factory crimp die for a little more than the standard set.Reloading manuals and now there are some good DVD's available.
Here are my "go to" manuals...
Lyman 49th Edition Reloading Handbook Reloading ManualSpeer Reloading Manual #14
Lee Modern Reloading Second Edition Reloading ManualI like books better than DVD's but there are some DBD training videos available.

You may want to consider a low cost set of Lee equipment to start out with, I have some of the most expensive reloading and swaging equipment available and find my self using my Lee classic turret the most...

Look at some past posts here about reloading, then check out some of the information on the web.

Reloading as a prepper skill (and more on Safety, and Brass)

A quote from the web...

"Reloading is a fun hobby and will be an invaluable skill if/when TSHTF."

For me .308/7.62x51 is my favorite for just shooting and one of my standard choices in my preparedness collection.

But recently the price of over the counter or surplus ammunition for recreational shooting is making lots of my friends and acquaintances start contacting me about getting into reloading.

The changes in politics, the economy, and the "quagmire sandbox" is starting to take a deep cut into the general "joe six pack" shooters.

I am making more and more purchases of reloading supplies to "fill in" where there is a need. I just have this strange feeling, "the hair on the back of the neck" thing in the last few weeks, something more than just what the politics would lead me to worry about. I'm not sure why I get the feeling that reloading supplies are higher priority than loaded ammo.

When silver hit over 13 bucks I switched to the new collectable metals, lead, brass, and copper best if assembled. I started buying the .22lr 550 packs at Wally World again, money I had set over for silver is now all allocated to reloading supplies and .22lr.

BE CAREFUL reloading is not to be taken lightly you hold in your hands tools that if used incorrectly or make a mistake is could be the destruction of your favorite rifle or pistol, and cause injury or death.

Three years ago at a range my father is a member of an incident happened I should recount as a warning. Improperly loaded ammo caused a catastrophic failure with a Remington 700 rifle in .270. When fired the load caused an over-pressure explosion, the scope and mount were peeled off and the bolt was pushed past the action and into the shooters shoulder. This was a disturbing event, and would be at any shooting range. Lucky for this shooter there were several other shooters there able to call in an ambulance and help him. Later we were to find out that he had been "testing" hot "compressed" loads and had mistaken a load max from a powder of a similar but slower type, he had looked at the wrong part of the chart on a page with several different caliber choices.

Regardless, you will find it a fun hobby and the increase in accuracy will be notable with all but the sloppiest rifles.

There are "pet" loads, most often they are matched to a particular rifle and they may not always work with your firearm. Please, always double check that the load is within safe margins for YOUR rifle, and if you are loading for an old rifle or surplus military that could be much lower than the published maximum loads.

Keep to the books! remember to start low in charge and work UP do not start at maximum, the warnings about the m1a rifle heavy bullet weight and op rod damage is a good example. The M1, M1a or M14 rifle was designed and manufactured for specific weight bullet and particular powder pressure curves they do not work well outside of a small range of powder charges and bullets. I have heard about many bent parts and gas system damage caused by loads that would be no problem in an HK91 or a bolt gun.

I early on got into the habit of double and triple checking my charts and loading procedures and checking the load depth in the cases to prevent mistakes and double charges, I have not had a single accident in all of my 20+ years of reloading and I count that not to luck but to careful procedures. Please keep your loads safe by developing good procedures.


Choosing brass.


IMI brass is notorious for its inconsistent quality and poor quality control, it is used in some cases as "throw down" or "blaster grade" reloads. A much better general product would be US military brass for general use.

Many shooters spend many hours shaving or turning rims, reaming and turning necks and even "prep fires" or "case forming" to get 100-200 cases out of 1000 that match for contest-ready rounds.

I sort by date and manufacturer by the headstamp I keep what I like and trade the headstamps I do not use. I try and buy .308 in bulk, I often buy the brass that is partly processed where the primer pocket crimps are removed.

Lapua then Norma branded brass cases are considered the two best for consistency, Winchester and Federal commercial new brass is often coveted by long range shooters. High quality offerings often labeled with a "match" or match name moniker have a cult like following in the long range shooting world, but bench rest shooters will most often go for Laupa and Norma.

If you are looking for just good quality brass that will shoot well and will hold up to multiple reloading cycles you would be best served with a purchase of processed US military brass. The internal capacity of the military cases is smaller than civilian market brass because the lower half to third are much thicker in the wall for strength.

Here is an example of a company that sells processed brass...

www.scharch.com

For self loading rifles like the M1a, HK91, FN FAL and others it is often worth the money to buy the processed brass for your first loading to save time. Your purpose for reloading is for supply and general shooting so finding the best of brass and loads is not as important as securing a consistent supply, at least at first.

One of the nice things about processed brass for this type of application is that any serious culls are dropped from the shipment. The machines that ream the pockets and trim the brass also kick out splits and odd brass so you buy less possible "file 13" cases. And in the end, what is your time worth?

Check the sizing so that they fit in your rifle's chamber, I find that often I have to size again because chambers are not all the same from rifle to rifle, a full length SB die will bring a case down to the minimum dimensions needed for auto-loading rifles.

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Metallic cartridge reloading for beginners, part 2


Kit or no kit?

If you are thinking about the starting kits for hand-loading pistol and rifle, one each for our example, my advice...

I would make my own kit...

If I were to start... knowing what I do now... what would I want, that would shave as much money as possible, and get everything I need to make it reasonable...

Assuming you are going to order from Midway...

Also assuming your are collecting your own brass to reload (and have been picking it up for some time now)

Prices are as of April 2, 2011

  1. Lee Classic Cast Single Stage Press Product #: 317831 $99.99
  2. Lee Carbide 3-Die Set 9mm Luger Product #: 140349 $27.99 (comes with shellholder)
  3. Lee Deluxe Rifle 3-Die Set 270 Winchester #: 279271 $30.99 (comes with shellholder)
  4. Lee Factory Crimp Die 270 Winchester #: 735849 $11.99
  5. Lee Factory Crimp Die 9mm Luger #: 557910 $15.99
  6. Frankford Arsenal Micro Reloading Electronic Powder Scale #: 175512 $36.99
  7. Lee Primer Pocket Cleaner Product #: 467111 $2.09
  8. L.E. Wilson Chamfer and Deburring Tool #: 789334 $14.99
  9. Lee Safety Prime Small and Large Primer #: 548630 $21.99
  10. RCBS Powder Trickler #: 317787 $13.99
  11. Frankford Arsenal Reloading Tray #5 #: 536734 $5.99
  12. Lee Perfect Powder Measure #: 540522 $23.99
  13. Lyman Case Trimmer #: 795961 $72.99
(I use a Forester, but the standard model will not trim pistol cases, I use the cheep lee trimmers for that)

Items from other places...

First you can make your own case sizing and forming lubricant with a small tube of lanolin and a bottle of castor oil - heat (carefully in the microwave, can we say third degree burns?) together and mix. This is the best lube ever, will even swage bullets, in a pinch castor oil alone works great.

  • www.harborfreight.com - 6" DIAL CALIPER $19.99
  • www.harborfreight.com - 5 LB. METAL VIBRATOR/TUMBLER ITEM $49.99 on sale! (only if you want clean shiny brass, you can wipe them off with a rag)
  • www.harborfreight.com - 25 lbs. Fine Grade Walnut Shell Blast Media $24.99 (only if you want clean shiny brass)
  • www.harborfreight.com - 5 Piece Test Probe Set $4.99
You can add any caliber to this setup, and should last a lifetime of loading...

Metallic cartridge reloading for beginners


A simple list and some beginner advice I make standard, prompted by postings on the web.

The question that prompted this post was about beginning kits, and the viability of a particular hand-powdered progressive press.

The Lee 1000 would be a BAD choice for a beginner...
If you want a fast press, think about the Lee classic four position turret, faster than single stage presses and less complicated to set up than a full progressive.

The 1000 from Lee is notorious for finicky setup (as noted by many others) and poor production - IT IS NOT A BEGINNER PRESS!!! it has a reputation for problems with even the MOST EXPERIENCED reloader/handloaders, in fact ANY of the turret presses would be a challenge for a new person.

The Lee Classic Turret Press, it is my most used press in my collection, it will load any pistol and rifle cartridge of "regular” size up to about .308 (and larger without some features).

Using the automatic powder dispenser will only work with an extra part and only up to .308. Larger cartridges will work on the press but the auto powder dispenser will not actuate (you will have to charge by hand). Setting up this press is easier than an automatic press, but that is difficult enough...

I have used automated units for my past business (hydraulic and electric tools far beyond even what most would see) and I dislike the automatic hand powered units, I do use the turret press, I consider it fast enough without automation.



I am a BIG supporter of Lee products for the market, I use them myself, and I like the lower prices (even though my best press is a Corbin a SINGLE STAGE $600 press) ...

I would suggest the Lee Classic Cast press, I have that model also...

I would strongly suggest that you start with a single stage press, that is one operation at a time, this is particularly good for reloading rifle cartridges and obtaining the best in accuracy.

As I listed here the term "classic" with Lee is used similar to "premium"...



Also many of your tools you can get from secondary sources like Harbor Freight for a set of measuring calipers and a vibratory polisher and walnut hull media (if you want shinny brass cases.

Without a doubt you could call me a former professional because I not only had a license from ATF for the manufacture of ammunition but I also made from lead and copper the bullets, not just any bullets but premium jacketed bullets for hunters, police, and benchrest shooters (premium bullets are often priced at $1.50 each or more - just the bullet).

With all that said safety is the main issue...

Reloading mistakes, even simple ones can be catastrophic...

It is best to learn slow on a simple strong quality press, like the single stage models.