Anti-gun propaganda is insidious

The manipulators who whore for the oligarchy create a particular problem, they know the average person has an issue - misunderstanding of statistical information and what the true value is in finding the facts.

The "for the children's safety" argument.

In my liberal suburban area moms will routinely ask "you don't own a gun, do you?"

I had this same question once, my response:

No we do not have a pool.

liberal mom:

What do you mean, a pool?

My response:

More kids drown in pools visiting friends than are killed by accidents with firearms, as you are clearly concerned with safety I was assuring you that a much larger statistical killer of children was not a problem in this household. 

If you would like me to help you understand statistics or firearm safety I would be glad as a professional to help. I am very concerned with your child's safety, as I am my own children.

The kid stayed the night, and she seemed satisfied with the answer. I would have been just as happy to have sent the little bastard home with a screeching idiot.

First, let's talk about suicides, why would suicides be counted with accidents? Lumping in an issue based on depression, mental illness, or a myriad of chemical and social problems.

What it is not of course is a child involved in a negligent discharge. (All accidents are due to some form of negligence)

Why would the problems with crime and general thuggery be included with accidents? Like suicide criminal activity committed with handguns has NO relation to safety inside the home in regards to legally owned firearms.

Crime related homicides and firearm negligence are NOT the same, and are just not comparable. 

Factoring conditional probability the chance of a child involved in an unintentional negligent death by firearm discharge is 4.3 to 5.6 times less likely than accidental death by drowning in a residential swimming pool.

When factoring the much higher chance of drowning by children under 16 the chance of death by firearm is almost 25 times LESS likely.

Falling for the false idea that "overwhelming numbers" equates to general applicable fact is sadly all to common. The "scary numbers" is how political whores attempt to manipulate the ignorant public.

A typically ignorant "mom" who gets her information from the standard indoctrination sources is about as useful and reliable as a crack addicted stripper, I have no use for irrational, ignorant, lemmings (at least irrational and ignorant can be fixed, but it takes abandoning the indoctrination).

Piers Morgan media whore dances on the corpses of dead children

Piers Morgan is a typical media whore, who with delight, dances on the corpses of dead children


Piers Morgan loses gun-control debate to Ben Shapiro

Piers Morgan of course is simply a nasty twat, Piers Morgan Was Fired In The UK For Being A Traitorous Fraud.

The hypocrites dancing on corpses

Whores, hypocrites, dancing on corpses.


Smiling actor? WTF?

A pox on their houses, all of them - left, right, and stupid!

While statist bully-by-proxy "journalist" whores like the disgraced philandering Piers Morgan dance gleefully on the corpses of the victims of drug addled mentally incompetent predators not a lot of protest for the hundreds of civilians, including children killed under the order of the US government. Your tax dollars paying for murdering far more children than this recent media feeding frenzy.

The United States government has made hundreds of attacks on targets drones controlled by the Central Intelligence Agency (The CIA BTW is now in direct control of all the US military special forces - look that scary fact up!).

This is under the bizarre title of "the war on terror" a bullshit term to cover for the death and profiteering under the military industrial complex.

These strikes (and civilian deaths) have increased to about 300 under the Presidency of Barack Obama.

"drone missiles cause collateral damage. A few militants are killed, but the majority of victims are innocent citizens." - Pakistan's Interior Minister Malik

Is this accurate, I am afraid as you see below it likely is very true.

Reports of the number of militants versus civilian casualties differ.

We could say that is an understatement, with the history of false flag attacks in our history and the long verified history of the US government lying I am sure there will be "discrepancies" in the reports.

"drone strikes may have killed 10 or so civilians for every mid- and high-ranking [al Qaeda and Taliban] leader." - Daniel L. Byman, Brookings Institution.

The CIA of course believes that the strikes from May 2010 have killed 600 or more militants and have not caused any civilian fatalities. - Fat chance that is accurate.

"between 391 – 780 civilians were killed out of a total of between 1,658 and 2,597 and that 160 children are reported among the deaths." - Bureau of Investigative Journalism

Since President Obama took office at least 50 civilians were killed in follow-up strikes when they had gone to help victims and more than 20 civilians have also been attacked in deliberate strikes on funerals and mourners. Just a few days ago another sociopathic murderer set fire to a house and used that to ambush some firefighters, I have to ask myself, what is so different in that to a follow-up drone strike?

George (the retarded monkey) W Bush had his handlers (puppet masters) have him institute water torture, in the Tokyo Trials (International Military Tribunal for the Far East) post World War II, manh Japanese soldiers were charged with torture. Japanese soldiers convicted by American judges were hanged, and others received lengthy prison sentences or time in labor camps for water-boarding. Even in the US In 1981 Texas sheriff James Parker and three of his deputies were convicted for conspiring to force confessions by suffocating water torture. (the placement of a towel over the nose and mouth of the prisoner and the pouring of water in the towel until the prisoner began to move, jerk, or otherwise indicate that he was suffocating and/or drowning). The sheriff was sentenced to ten years in prison, and the deputies to four years

(See R. John Pritchard, The Tokyo War Crimes Trial: The Complete Transcripts of the Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East. and Yuma Totani, history professor UNLV, Drop by Drop: Forgetting the History of Water Torture in U.S. Courts.)

Did anything come of that war crime?

Where is the shrieking of the media whores over the deaths of children by drone explosion? What happened to all the calls for Monkey Bush to be arrested for war crimes - somehow I clearly see that both the indoctrinated left-liberal-progressives and the statist ignorant flag-wrapped republican robots have no real testicular fortitude, nor care one bit "about the children" they are simply brainless demagogues - woe is our future.

Note: I have no solid position on the validity of the recent shooting, the above videos point out some strange things related, while there could be something to this I simply do not know, what I do know is that something is fishy.